Beier: On the Book Trade and its Privileges, Jena (1690)

Source: Scanned from a reprint edited by Reinhard Wittmann (Munich: Kraus International Publishing, 1981)

Citation:
Beier: On the Book Trade and its Privileges, Jena (1690), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | No Commentaries
Record-ID: d_1690a

Permanent link: http://www.copyrighthistory.org/record/d_1690a

Full title:
Short Account of the Useful and Laudable Book Trade and its Privileges

Full title original language:
Kurtzer Bericht von der Nützlichen und Fürtrefflichen Buch-Handlung und Deroselben Privilegien. Auffge[se]tzet von Adrian Beiern, J.C.

Abstract:
When Beier points to the benefit of even unlicensed abridged versions, his argument is quite similar to the modern economic concept of network externalities. The more attention people pay even to a corrupted version, the more buyers there will be of the original, too. In Beier's view both the author and his publisher have to give their consent first to any adaptations of their works, and it is only 'fair and just' for them to complain if they are not asked beforehand. However, the 'first publisher' - as Beier puts it at the very end - is the supreme authority. Even if Beier did not put forward any new arguments in the plagiarism and reprinting disputes of the seventeenth century, his books do shed light on the standard practices of printing privileges and, in general, on the book publishing and trading industry of his time.

Commentary: No commentaries for this record.

Bibliography:
N/A

Related documents in this database:
N/A

Author: Adrian Beier (1634-1698)

Publisher: Johann Meyer

Year: 1690

Location: Jena

Language: German

Source: Scanned from a reprint edited by Reinhard Wittmann (Munich: Kraus International Publishing, 1981)

Persons referred to:
Carpzov, Benedict Jr
Doneau, Hugues
Hilliger, Oswald
Limnaeus, Johannes

Places referred to:
N/A

Cases referred to:
Conring v. Oldenburger (plagiarism case)
Erfurt Law Faculty's memorandum of 1669 on an unauthorised abridged edition of a law treat ...

Institutions referred to:
Erfurt Law Faculty

Legislation:
N/A

Keywords:
abridgements
adaptation
authorship, legal concept of
book trade
customs
editions, new
guilds
oral works, protected subject matter
plagiarism
printing, history of
privileges
privileges, French
privileges, Saxon
taxation
universities

Responsible editor: Friedemann Kawohl


Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK