Wächter: 'Publishing Right', Stuttgart (1857)

Source: Scanned from a copy held in the Frankfurt Max-Planck-Institut für Europäische Rechtsgeschichte

Citation:
Wächter: 'Publishing Right', Stuttgart (1857), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | Commentaries: [1]
Record-ID: d_1857

Permanent link: http://www.copyrighthistory.org/record/d_1857

Full title:
Publishing Right, including theories of the publishing contract and of reprinting, in accordance with the existing German and international laws, with special reference to the legislations of Austria, Prussia, Bavaria and Saxony

Full title original language:
Das Verlagsrecht, mit Einschluss d. Lehren von dem Verlagsvertrag u. Nachdr. nach d. geltenden deutschen u. internationalen Rechten mit bes. Rücksicht auf d. Gesetzgebungen von Oesterreich, Preussen, Bayern u. Sachsen

Abstract:
According to Wächter, the author's right is purely a publishing right that can be completely alienated by means of a publishing contract. This view resembles British and American notions of copyright and was also invoked by Hitzig, Meinert, and Gerber. In this sense it was the direct opposite of the personalistic approach employed by Neustetel, Bluntschli, and Gareis.

1 Commentary:
commentary_d_1857

Bibliography:
  • Pahlow, Louis, 'Lizenz und Lizenzvertrag im Recht des geistigen Eigentums' (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2006)

  • Dölemeyer, Barbara and Diethelm Klippel, 'Theorie des gewerblichen Rechtsschutzes und Urheberrechts', in Friedrich-Karl Beier et al (eds), 'Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht in Deutschland', vol. 1 (Weinheim: VCH, 1991)


Related documents in this database:
N/A

Author: Oscar von Wächter (1825-1902)

Publisher: J.G. Cotta

Year: 1857

Location: Stuttgart

Language: German

Source: Scanned from a copy held in the Frankfurt Max-Planck-Institut für Europäische Rechtsgeschichte

Persons referred to:

Beseler, Karl Georg Christoph
Blanc, Etienne
Bluntschli, Johann Kaspar
Eckermann, Johann Peter
Ehlers, Martin
Eisenlohr, Ludwig Wilhelm Anton
Gerber, Karl Friedrich Wilhelm von
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang
Grolmann, Karl Ludwig Wilhelm von
Harum, Johann Christian von
Heffter, August Wilhelm
Jolly, Julius
Kramer, Wilhelm August
Maurenbrecher, Romeo
Neustetel, Leopold Josef
Pütter, Johann Stephan
Quistorp, Johann Christian von
Renouard, Augustin-Charles
Schiller, Friedrich
Tittmann, Karl August
Volkmann, Johann Jacob
Walter, Ferdinand
Wächter, Oscar von

Places referred to:
N/A

Cases referred to:
Schelling v. Paulus (1845-1846)

Institutions referred to:
N/A

Legislation:
Austrian Copyright Act 1846
Austro-Sardinian Copyright Treaty 1840
Bavarian Copyright Act 1814
Gotha directive 1828
Hamburg directive 1847
Hessen Copyright Act 1830
Luxembourg Copyright Act 1817
Meining directive 1829
Prussian Copyright Act 1837
Saxonian Copyright Act 1844

Keywords:
adaptation
anonymous works
anthologies
applied art, protected subject matter
architecture, protected subject matter
art market
authorship, legal concept of
authorship, theory of
books, protected subject matter
classics, Greek and Latin
compilation
copying, concept of
dramatic works, protected subject matter
drawings, protected subject matter
duration
editions, new
engravings, protected subject matter
excluded subject matter
fixation
forgery
idea/expression
imitation
immoral works
inheritability
inventions
law books
letters
maps, protected subject matter
moral rights, divulgation (first publication)
music, protected subject matter
newspapers
oral works, protected subject matter
originality
paintings, protected subject matter
patents, for invention
plagiarism
property analogies
property theory, authors' property
property theory, publishers' property
public domain
replica
reputation
scholarly writing
sculpture, protected subject matter
transferability
translation, right of
translations, protection of
unpublished works

Responsible editor: Friedemann Kawohl


Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK