Le Chapelier's report, Paris (1791)

Source: N/A

Citation:
Le Chapelier's report, Paris (1791), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | Commentaries: [1]
Record-ID: f_1791

Permanent link: http://www.copyrighthistory.org/record/f_1791

Full title:
Report of Le Chapelier on Dramatic Author's property (with the Decree adopted by the National Assembly)

Full title original language:
N/A

Abstract:
Le Chapelier's report on Dramatic Author's property is often mentioned in the literary property historical debates for its famous assertion on the most sacred of all properties at last secured by revolutionary legislation ('La plus sacrée, la plus légitime, la plus inattaquable et, si je puis parler ainsi, la plus personnelle de toutes les propriétés, est l'ouvrage, fruit de la pensée d'un écrivainâ%80%A6'), in fact two years before Lakanal's preamble to the artistic and literary property law (July 1793). Whatever 'personal' the nature of property may have been to its author, the new legislation was however more complicated to interpret than it seemed, as duration, before the 'public property' had to start, remained thoroughly limited in time.

1 Commentary:
commentary_f_1791

Bibliography:
N/A

Related documents in this database:
N/A

Author: Le Chapelier

Publisher: N/A

Year: 1791

Location: Paris

Language: French

Source: N/A

Persons referred to:
Corneille, Pierre
Crébillon, Prosper Jolyot de
Le Chapelier, Isaac René Guy
Louis XIV
Molière
Racine, Jean
Voltaire, François Marie Arouet de

Places referred to:
England
France
Paris

Cases referred to:
N/A

Institutions referred to:
Comité de Constitution (National Assembly)
National Assembly (1789-1791)

Legislation:
French law of 13 January 1791, concerning the works of living playwrights
Statute of Anne, 1710, 8 Anne, c.19

Keywords:
Enlightenment, the
French Revolution
authors' remuneration
authorship, legal concept of
authorship, romantic concept of
censorship
contract
divisibility
duration
duration, post mortem term
idea/expression
immoral works
incentives
inheritability
interest groups
monopoly
natural rights
penalties, paid to author(s)
personality theory
private domain
privileges
privileges, French
property theory, authors' property
public domain
public good
public performance
transferability

Responsible editor: Frédéric Rideau


Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK