Reasons for objecting to the renewal of the Licensing Act, London (1695)

Source: University of Birmingham Library: Journal of the House of Commons, Vol.11, 305-306

Citation:
Reasons for objecting to the renewal of the Licensing Act, London (1695), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | No Commentaries
Record-ID: uk_1695

Permanent link: http://www.copyrighthistory.org/record/uk_1695

Full title:
House of Commons' Reasons for objecting to the renewal of the Licensing Act

Full title original language:
N/A

Abstract:
This document is associated with the following core document: uk_1662

Commentary: No commentaries for this record.

Bibliography:
N/A

Related documents in this database:
1662: Licensing Act
1662: Licensing Act (parchment copy)
1663: L'Estrange's Considerations and Proposals
1690: Locke's Second Treatise on Government (selected extracts)
1693: Locke's Memorandum on the 1662 Act

Author: N/A

Publisher: N/A

Year: 1695

Location: London

Language: English

Source: University of Birmingham Library: Journal of the House of Commons, Vol.11, 305-306

Persons referred to:
James I
Streater, John

Places referred to:
Canterbury
England
London

Cases referred to:
N/A

Institutions referred to:
House of Lords
Parliament
Stationers' Company

Legislation:
Licensing Act, 1662, 13 & 14 Car.II, c.33

Keywords:
Stationers' Company
book trade
classics, Greek and Latin
defamation
excluded subject matter
import
lobbying
monopoly
penalties

Responsible editor: Ronan Deazley


Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK