Pope's Bill of Complaint, and Curl's Answer, London (1741)

Source: The National Archives: c.11 1569/29

Citation:
Pope's Bill of Complaint, and Curl's Answer, London (1741), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | No Commentaries
Record-ID: uk_1741c

Permanent link: http://www.copyrighthistory.org/record/uk_1741c

Full title:
Alexander Pope's Bill of Complaint, and Edmund Curl's Answer

Full title original language:
N/A

Abstract:
This document is associated with the following core document: uk_1741a

Commentary: No commentaries for this record.

Bibliography:
N/A

Related documents in this database:
1741: Pope v. Curl
1741: Pope v Curl: Entry from the Court's Book of Orders

Author: N/A

Publisher: Unpublished

Year: 1741

Location: London

Language: English

Source: The National Archives: c.11 1569/29

Persons referred to:
Anne
Arbuthnot, John
Atterbury, Francis
Bolingbroke, Henry St John, 1st Viscount
Curl, Edmund
Douglas, Catherine
Douglas, Charles, 3rd Duke of Queensberry
Faulkener, George
Gay, John
George II
Goode, Barnham
Pope, Alexander
Swift, Jonathan
Wotton, William
Yorke, Philip, 1st Earl of Hardwicke

Places referred to:
Covent Garden
Dublin
Ireland
London
Middlesex
Twickenham

Cases referred to:
N/A

Institutions referred to:
St Paul's Church

Legislation:
Statute of Anne, 1710, 8 Anne, c.19

Keywords:
authorship, legal concept of
letters
private domain
property theory, authors' property
remedies
unpublished works

Responsible editor: Ronan Deazley


Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK