Stationers' Company v. Carnan, London (1775)

Source: Lincolns Inn Library

Citation:
Stationers' Company v. Carnan, London (1775), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | Commentaries: [1]
Record-ID: uk_1775

Permanent link: http://www.copyrighthistory.org/record/uk_1775

Full title:
Stationers' Company v. Carnan (1775) 2 W. Bl. 1004

Full title original language:
N/A

Abstract:
Case in which the Court of Common Pleas decided that the Crown did not have the authority to grant exclusive prerogative rights over the printing of almanacs, a monopoly which the Stationers' Company had enjoyed, uncontested, since the formation of the 'English Stock' in the early seventeenth century. The commentary describes the background to the litigation, as well as the various strategies that the Stationers' Company employed in their efforts to regain control of the almanac market in the wake of the decision. It also explores how the decision provided the springboard for the emergence of a more contemporary concept of prerogative copyright. It was no longer thought that the Crown could grant printing patents over certain classes of work as of right. Rather, it was the monarch's unique constitutional position as head of both church and state that imposed an obligation to ensure the dissemination of authentic and authoritative versions of both legal and religious materials, and, from this obligation, the right to print the same arose.

1 Commentary:
commentary_uk_1775

Bibliography:
  • Monotti, A., 'Nature and Basis of Crown Copyright in Official Publications', European Intellectual Property Review, 14 (1992): 305-16

  • Blagden, C., 'Thomas Carnan and the Almanack Monopoly', Studies in Bibliography, 14 (1961): 26-43

  • Blagden, C.,The Stationers' Company: A History, 1403-1959 (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1960)


Related documents in this database:
N/A

Author: N/A

Publisher: N/A

Year: 1775

Location: London

Language: English

Source: Lincolns Inn Library

Persons referred to:
Blackstone, William
Caesar, Gaius Julius
Carnan, Thomas
Edward VI
Elizabeth I
Gibson, Edmund
Gould, Henry
Gregory XIII
Grose, Nash
Henry VII
James I
Mansfield, William Murray, 1st Earl
Mary I
Nares, John
Strype, John
Yates, Joseph
de Grey, William

Places referred to:
N/A

Cases referred to:
Basket v. University of Cambridge (1758) 2 Keny. 397, 1 Black W. 105, 2 Burr. 661
Millar v. Taylor (1769) 4 Burr. 2303
Stationers' Company v. Carnan (1775) 2 W. Bl. 1004
Stationers' Company v. Leigh (1681) 34 & 35 Car.II Snow. 258; 2 Ch. Cas. 66
Stationers' Company v. Marlow 32 Car. 2. Lilly's Entr. 63; 2 Snow. 233.
Stationers' Company v. Parker (1686), King's Bench; Skinn. 233
Stationers' Company v. Partridge (1709) 11 Ann. (King's Bench); 10 Mod. 105
Stationers' Company v. Seymour (1677) 1 Mod. 256

Institutions referred to:
Court of Common Pleas
House of Lords
See of Canterbury
See of London
Stationers' Company

Legislation:
N/A

Keywords:
Stationers' Company
almanacs
monopoly
religious works
remedies
taxation

Responsible editor: Ronan Deazley


Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK