Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Bill (6 May), London (1861)

Source: University of Birmingham Library: Hansard, 3rd Ser., vol.162, 1631-37

Citation:
Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Bill (6 May), London (1861), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | No Commentaries
Record-ID: uk_1861a

Permanent link: http://www.copyrighthistory.org/record/uk_1861a

Full title:
Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Bill: Hansard, 3rd Ser., 162 (1861): 1631-37 (6 May)

Full title original language:
N/A

Abstract:
This document is associated with the following core document: uk_1862

Commentary: No commentaries for this record.

Bibliography:
N/A

Related documents in this database:
1853: Blaine's Laws of Artistic Copyright
1858: Report of the Artistic Copyright Committee
1861: Fine Art Copyright Bill
1862: Fine Art Copyright Act
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (28 Feb.)
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (6 March)
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (20 March)
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (31 March)
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (22 May)
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (23 May)
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (5 June)
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (24 July)
1862: Fine Art Copyright Bill (27 Feb.)
1862: Fine Art Copyright Bill (20 March)

Author: N/A

Publisher: N/A

Year: 1861

Location: London

Language: English

Source: University of Birmingham Library: Hansard, 3rd Ser., vol.162, 1631-37

Persons referred to:
Atherton, Sir William
Bethell, Richard, 1st Baron Westbury
Burke-Roche, Edmond, 1st Baron Fermoy
Coningham, William
Layard, Sir Austen Henry
Michelangelo
Raphael
Reynolds, Sir Joshua
Turner, Joseph Mallord William
Walter, John

Places referred to:
Europe

Cases referred to:
N/A

Institutions referred to:
House of Commons
National Gallery

Legislation:
N/A

Keywords:
art market
authenticity
commissions
copy
idea/expression
originality
paintings, protected subject matter
portrait

Responsible editor: Ronan Deazley


Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK