Artistic Copyright Bill, London, London (1869)

Source: Cambridge University Library

Citation:
Artistic Copyright Bill, London, London (1869), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | Commentaries: [1]
Record-ID: uk_1869

Permanent link: http://www.copyrighthistory.org/record/uk_1869

Full title:
Fine Arts Copyright Consolidation and Amendment Bill (No 2) 1869 HL 51

Full title original language:
N/A

Abstract:
The Artistic Copyright Bill 1869, presented to the House of Lords by Lord Westbury (Richard Bethell), originated with the Society of Arts, the body that had led the campaign culminating in the Fine Arts Copyright Act 1862. As the Commentary explains, the 1869 Bill favoured the interests of the art collector over the painter; this was unlike the position with the campaign culminating in the 1862 Act, where the Society of Arts’ proposals were prepared by a Copyright Committee dominated by Royal Academician painters. The 1869 Bill, which influenced the recommendations on painting copyright made by the Royal Commission on Copyright in 1878, became the source of furious opposition in the later nineteenth century, by the Royal Academy of Arts.

1 Commentary:
commentary_uk_1869

Bibliography:
  • Cooper, E., Art and Modern Copyright: The Contested Image (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018)


Related documents in this database:

Author: N/A

Publisher: N/A

Year:
1869

Location: London

Language: English

Source: Cambridge University Library

Persons referred to:
Lord Westbury
Victoria

Places referred to:
British dominions
Channel Islands
England
Ireland
Isle of Man
Scotland

Cases referred to:
N/A

Institutions referred to:
British Museum
House of Commons
House of Lords
Stationers’ Company

Legislation:
N/A

Keywords:
Art
Collectors
Delabere Roberton Blaine
Engraving
Lord Westbury
Painting
Photographs
Repetitions
Replicas
Richard Bethell
Sculpture
Society of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce

Responsible editor: N/A


Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK