Commentary on:
Encyclopaedia Article on 'The Reprinting of Books' (1740)

Back | Commentary info | Commentary
Printer friendly version
Creative Commons License
This work by www.copyrighthistory.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900)

www.copyrighthistory.org

Identifier: d_1740

 

Johann Abraham Birnbaum, encyclopaedia article on "The Reprinting of Books" for Zedler's Universal-Lexikon (1740)

Friedemann Kawohl

Centre for Intellectual Property Policy & Management, Bournemouth University, UK

 

Please cite as:
Kawohl, F. (2008) ‘Commentary on J. A. Birnbaum's encyclopaedia article on 'The Reprinting of Books' (1740)', in Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

 

1. Full title

2. Abstract

3. References

 

1. Full title

Anonymous article by Johann Abraham Birnbaum on "The Reprinting of Books" for Johann Heinrich Zedler's Großes Universal-Lexikon (1740)

 

2. Abstract

The anonymous article on "The Reprinting of Books" in vol. 23 of Johann Heinrich Zedler (1706-1751)'s encyclopaedia, the Großes Universal-Lexikon, was mainly based on an earlier book by Johann Abraham Birnbaum (1702-1748) that had also been published anonymously.[1] There is no direct evidence for Birnbaum's authorship of the article, but it does seem very likely given that many editors of the Zedler Universal-Lexikon were based at Leipzig University, where Birnbaum taught as a lecturer in rhetoric.

 

Birnbaum acknowledges an intellectual property of the author[2] and identifies physical and non-physical aspects of the book. The author's disposal of the manuscript, however, is in Birnbaum‘s view a "complete cession of all rights associated with it which otherwise belong exclusively to the work's author."[3]

 

Ironically, Zedler‘s 64-volume Universal-Lexikon (the first volume of which was published in Leipzig in 1731) was at first confiscated by the authorities because many of its scholarly articles had evidently been plagiarised from encyclopaedias brought out by other Leipzig publishers.[4] A few years later, to compound the irony, the Universal-Lexikon in its turn would be illegally reprinted, after Zedler's Imperial privilege was revoked in 1737, possibly under pressure of the reprinter himself, Johann Ernst Schultze, a publisher based in the Bavarian town of Hof.[5]

 

3. References

  

Books and articles [in alphabetical order]

Gieseke, L., Vom Privileg zum Urheberrecht (Baden-Baden: Nomos 1995)

Quedenbaum, G., Der Verleger und Buchhändler Joahnn Heinrich Zedler 1706-1751 (Hildesheim: Olms, 1977)

Raupp, W., article "Zedler", in T. Bautz (ed.), Biographisch-Bibliographisches Kirchenlxikon, vol. 26 (2006), 1576-1588. Available online at:

<http://www.bautz.de>

Wittmann, R., Geschichte des deutschen Buchhandels (Munich: Beck, 1999)



[1] Anonymus [Birnbaum, Johann Abraham], Eines aufrichtigen Patrioten unpartheyische Gedancken über einige Quellen und Wirckungen des Verfalls der ietzigen Buch-Handlung, worinnen insonderheit die Betrügereyen der Bücher-Pränumerationen entdeckt, und zugleich erwiesen wird, daß der unbefugte Nachdruck unprivilegirter Bücher ein allen Rechten zuwiederlauffender Diebstahl sey (Schweinfurt: Fischer 1733).

[2]  "No one will deny that what these writers' inventiveness has brought forth and their untiring diligence has put into good order, belongs to them. If it is their property, then they are entitled to use it as a means of subsistence as they wish and as they find suitable to achieve this aim as conveniently as possible." (images of current document, p. 61)

[3] Ibid., p. 62

[4] Werner Raupp, article "Zedler", in Traugott Bautz (ed.), Biographisch-Bibliographisches Kirchenlexikon, vol. 26 (2006), 1576-1588. Available online at: <http://www.bautz.de>

[5] Gerd Quedenbaum, Der Verleger und Buchhändler Joahnn Heinrich Zedler 1706-1751 (Hildesheim: Olms, 1977).


Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK