# Primary Sources on Copyright - Record Viewer
Amsterdam District Court on the exclusive right to translate a foreign literary work, Amsterdam (1843)

Source: Het letterkundig eigendomsregt in Nederland: wetten, traktaten, regtspraak: benevens de wetgeving op de drukpers in Nederland en Nederlandsch Indië Vereeniging ter bevordering van de belangen des boekhandels, ’s Gravenhage : Belinfante 1865-1867, I (1865), pp. 135-139; Bijzondere Collecties, Universiteitsbibliotheek van Amsterdam, UBM KVB 6730:1

Citation:
Amsterdam District Court on the exclusive right to translate a foreign literary work, Amsterdam (1843), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | No Commentaries
Translation only | Transcription only | Show all | Bundled images as pdf
            Chapter 1 Page 5 of 5 total

(139)

the work of Ch. Dickens in No. 12 of the Leeskabinet, has not infringed upon the rights of the plaintiff;
Given the already reported Decrees of 24th Jan. and 23rd Sept. 1814, 24th Jan. 1815, and 26th Jan. 1817, as well as art. 56 Civ. Proc. Code.;
Rendering judgment etc.;
Denies the plaintiff his delivered claim and statement against the defendant, and
Orders him to pay the costs of these proceedings.

[...]

    

(139)

het werk van Ch. Dickens in no. 12 van het Leeskabinet, op de regten van den eischer geen inbreuk heeft gemaakt;
Gezien de meergemelde besluiten van den 24 Jan. en 23 Sept. 1814, en den 24 Jan. 1815, en van den 26 Jan. 1817, alsmede art. 56 wetb. van Burg. Regtsv.;
Regt doende enz.;
Ontzegt aan den eischer zijnen op ende jegens den ged. genomen eisch en conclussie, en
Veroordeelt hem in de kosten van dit regtsgeding.

[...]

    

Our Partners

Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.

Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) is co-published by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK and CREATe, School of Law, University of Glasgow, 10 The Square, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK