![]() | |||||||
| |
|
||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Core documents by: ![]() Date Place ![]() ![]() Core documents for: ![]() Italy Germany France Britain United States ![]() All documents for: ![]() Italy Germany France Britain United States ![]() Original language: ![]() English French German Italian Latin ![]() Browse documents by: ![]() Person ... by name ... by occupation ... by life dates Place Institution Legislation Case law ![]() Browse commentaries by: ![]() Person ... by name ... by occupation ... by life dates Place Institution Legislation Case law ![]() Browse database by: ![]() Key words ![]() ![]() Editors' login: ![]() | Court of Cassation on artistic property, (1842) Source: Bibliothèque universitaire de Poitiers (SCD) : Dalloz, Jurisprudence générale. Recueil Périodique et critique de jurisprudence, de legislation et de doctrine, 1842.1.297 Citation: Court of Cassation on artistic property (1842), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org Record Images Record-ID: f_1842 Full title Heirs of Baron Gros & Vallot v. Gavard, Court of Cassation. 27 May 1842. Full title original language Héritiers baron Gros et Vallot C. Gavard, Cour de Cassation. Du 27 mai 1842. Abstract Following the law of 19 July 1793 and the difficulties in interpreting its first article, which specified that painters and designers were to enjoy the right to reproduce their works (whereby engraving was the only means of reproduction explicitly mentioned), the question as to what consequences the transfer of the original physical medium of the work of art (say, a painting) implied, would be settled once and for all for the remainder of the nineteenth century by the Court of Cassation in 1842. The supreme judges considered the property of the physical medium to be essential, and, unless there was a contractual stipulation to the contrary, all the rights attached to the former were presumed to be transferred simultaneously with it. However, before reaching this decision, questions were inevitably raised about how one should imagine the dematerialization of the object of the property secured by the revolutionary legislation. Bibliography N/A Related documents in this database Author N/A Publisher Dalloz Location N/A Year 1842 Language French Source Bibliothèque universitaire de Poitiers (SCD) : Dalloz, Jurisprudence générale. Recueil Périodique et critique de jurisprudence, de legislation et de doctrine, 1842.1.297 Physical description N/A Illustrations tables N/A Persons referred to Dupin, André Marie Jean Jacques (1783-1865) Gros, Antoine-Jean, Baron (1771-1835) Mesnard, M. (fl.1842) Portalis, Joseph Marie Portalis, 1st Count (1778-1858) Nachet, Louis Isidore (1802-1877) Scribe, Achille (fl.1818-1842) Vallot, Philippe Joseph (1796-1870) Persons referred to in commentary Couhin, Claude Raoul (b.1850) Dupin, André Marie Jean Jacques (1783-1865) Gavard, Jacques Dominique Charles (1794-1871) Greuze, Jean Baptiste (1725-1805) Gros, Antoine-Jean, Baron (1771-1835) Héricourt, Louis d' (1687-1752) Lamartine, Alphonse Marie Louis de (1790-1869) Pouillet, Eugène (1835-1905) Renouard, Augustin-Charles (1794-1878) Robert, Louis-Robert (1794-1835) Vallot, Philippe Joseph (1796-1870) Vaunois, Albert (fl.1893) Villemain, Abel-François (1790-1870) Watteau, Jean Antoine (1684-1721) Places referred to Paris Places referred to in commentary Orleans Paris Legislation referred to French Copyright Act 1793 Code civil (Napoleonic code) 1804 Legislation referred to in commentary French royal declaration on sculpture and painting (1777) French Copyright Act 1793 Code civil (Napoleonic code) 1804 French Law 1910, requiring future royalties for reproductions of works of art to be paid to the artist or his estate Intellectual Property Code (France) Cases referred to Heirs of Baron Gros & Vallot v. Gavard (1842) Cases referred to in commentary Heirs of Baron Gros & Vallot v. Gavard (1842) Institutions referred to Court of Cassation (Paris) Institutions referred to in commentary Court of Appeal (Paris) Court of Cassation (Paris) Tribunal correctionnel de la Seine Key words authors' remuneration authorship, legal concept of duration engravings, protected subject matter fixation idea/expression inheritability moral rights, theory paintings, protected subject matter property theory property theory, authors' property public good replica reputation transferability Responsible editor Frédéric Rideau Copyright status Original document is out of copyright. In so far as these scans are protected by copyright, they are made available on the same terms as translations and commentaries (see home page). | ||||||
![]() | |||||||
| Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK | |||||||