![]() | |||||||
| |
|
||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Core documents by: ![]() Date Place ![]() ![]() Core documents for: ![]() Italy Germany France Britain United States ![]() All documents for: ![]() Italy Germany France Britain United States ![]() Original language: ![]() English French German Italian Latin ![]() Browse documents by: ![]() Person ... by name ... by occupation ... by life dates Place Institution Legislation Case law ![]() Browse commentaries by: ![]() Person ... by name ... by occupation ... by life dates Place Institution Legislation Case law ![]() Browse database by: ![]() Key words ![]() ![]() Editors' login: ![]() | Schott v. Egenolph, Strasbourg (1533) Source: Institut für Stadtgeschichte Frankfurt a. M., Reichskammergerichtsakten Prozess Nr. 1400 Schott v Egenolph Citation: Schott v. Egenolph (1533), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org Record Images Commentary Record-ID: d_1533 Full title Writ of the Strasbourg printer Johannes Schott, filed at the Imperial Chamber Court on 14 July 1533 in Schott v. Egenolph Full title original language N/A Abstract This is a writ submitted to the Imperial Chamber Court on 14 July 1533 by Johann (Hans) Schott. Schott claims that the Frankfurt printer Christian Egenolph has reprinted his publication of a German translation ("Contrafayt Kräuterbuch") of Otto Brunfels's herbal "Portrait of Living Plants" ("Herbarium vivae eicones ad naturae imitationem", 1st part 1530), thereby violating the Imperial privilege which had been granted for the original Latin edition. He focuses on the excellent woodcuts produced for Schott's edition by Hans Weiditz (a pupil of Dürer), accusing Egenolph of having used copies of these drawings, albeit on a smaller scale, for his Frankfurt edition. Schott v. Egenolph is the first reprint case in the Holy Roman Empire and the first of three such cases heard before the Imperial Chamber Court ("Reichskammergericht") over the course of the sixteenth century. Although a verdict on this case has not been found in the records, it has been concluded from the editorial history of Brunsfels's book that the court adjudicated in favour of the plaintiff. Bibliography N/A Related documents in this database Author Johannes (Hans) Schott Publisher unpublished Location Strasbourg Year 1533 Language German Source Institut für Stadtgeschichte Frankfurt a. M., Reichskammergerichtsakten Prozess Nr. 1400 Schott v Egenolph Physical description N/A Illustrations tables N/A Persons referred to Charles V of Habsburg (1500-1558) Egenolph, Christian Sr. (1501-1555) Schott, Johann (fl.1520-1533) Persons referred to in commentary Brunfels, Otto (c.1488-1534) Charles V of Habsburg (1500-1558) Dürer, Albrecht (1471-1528) Egenolph, Christian Sr. (1501-1555) Maximilian I (1459-1519) Schott, Johann (fl.1520-1533) Weiditz, Hans (c.1495-1536) Places referred to Frankfurt Strasbourg Places referred to in commentary Cologne Frankfurt Strasbourg Worms Legislation referred to N/A Legislation referred to in commentary N/A Cases referred to Schott v. Egenolph (1533) Cases referred to in commentary Schott v. Egenolph (1533) Institutions referred to Frankfurt City Council Frankfurt fair Institutions referred to in commentary Frankfurt City Council Frankfurt fair Imperial Supreme Court (Reichskammergericht, Speyer) Key words book fairs counterfeit drawings, protected subject matter guilds licensing, Approbation penalties privileges, German Imperial reprints translations, of contemporary works Responsible editor Friedemann Kawohl Copyright status Photographic images and scans of public domain documents may be protected under some copyright laws and/or contractual restrictions apply. If you wish to use images of this document in other contexts, please contact the relevant archive (see source). Translation and commentary fall under the project licence (see home page). Photographic images and scans of public domain documents may be protected under some copyright laws and/or contractual restrictions apply. If you wish to use images of this document in other contexts, please contact the relevant archive (see source). Translation and commentary fall under the project licence (see home page). | ||||||
![]() | |||||||
| Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK | |||||||