Home | Launch conference | Methodology | Editorial board | Acknowledgements | Contact








Core documents by:
Date
Place



Core documents for:
Italy
Germany
France
Britain
United States


All documents for:
Italy
Germany
France
Britain
United States


Original language:
English
French
German
Italian
Latin


Browse documents by:
   Person
... by name
... by occupation
... by life dates

Place
Institution
Legislation
Case law


Browse commentaries by:
   Person
... by name
... by occupation
... by life dates

Place
Institution
Legislation
Case law


Browse database by:
Key words






Editors' login:




Schott v. Egenolph, Strasbourg (1533)

Source:
Institut für Stadtgeschichte Frankfurt a. M., Reichskammergerichtsakten
Prozess Nr. 1400 Schott v Egenolph

Citation:
Schott v. Egenolph (1533), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Record Images Commentary


Record-ID:
d_1533

Full title
Writ of the Strasbourg printer Johannes Schott, filed at the Imperial Chamber Court on 14 July 1533 in Schott v. Egenolph

Full title original language
N/A

Abstract
This is a writ submitted to the Imperial Chamber Court on 14 July 1533 by Johann (Hans) Schott. Schott claims that the Frankfurt printer Christian Egenolph has reprinted his publication of a German translation ("Contrafayt Kräuterbuch") of Otto Brunfels's herbal "Portrait of Living Plants" ("Herbarium vivae eicones ad naturae imitationem", 1st part 1530), thereby violating the Imperial privilege which had been granted for the original Latin edition. He focuses on the excellent woodcuts produced for Schott's edition by Hans Weiditz (a pupil of Dürer), accusing Egenolph of having used copies of these drawings, albeit on a smaller scale, for his Frankfurt edition. Schott v. Egenolph is the first reprint case in the Holy Roman Empire and the first of three such cases heard before the Imperial Chamber Court ("Reichskammergericht") over the course of the sixteenth century. Although a verdict on this case has not been found in the records, it has been concluded from the editorial history of Brunsfels's book that the court adjudicated in favour of the plaintiff.

Bibliography
N/A

Related documents in this database

Author
Johannes (Hans) Schott

Publisher
unpublished

Location
Strasbourg

Year
1533

Language
German

Source
Institut für Stadtgeschichte Frankfurt a. M., Reichskammergerichtsakten
Prozess Nr. 1400 Schott v Egenolph

Physical description
N/A

Illustrations tables
N/A

Persons referred to
Charles V of Habsburg (1500-1558)
Egenolph, Christian Sr. (1501-1555)
Schott, Johann (fl.1520-1533)

Persons referred to in commentary
Brunfels, Otto (c.1488-1534)
Charles V of Habsburg (1500-1558)
Dürer, Albrecht (1471-1528)
Egenolph, Christian Sr. (1501-1555)
Maximilian I (1459-1519)
Schott, Johann (fl.1520-1533)
Weiditz, Hans (c.1495-1536)

Places referred to
Frankfurt
Strasbourg

Places referred to in commentary
Cologne
Frankfurt
Strasbourg
Worms

Legislation referred to
N/A

Legislation referred to in commentary
N/A

Cases referred to
Schott v. Egenolph (1533)

Cases referred to in commentary
Schott v. Egenolph (1533)

Institutions referred to
Frankfurt City Council
Frankfurt fair

Institutions referred to in commentary
Frankfurt City Council
Frankfurt fair
Imperial Supreme Court (Reichskammergericht, Speyer)

Key words
book fairs
counterfeit
drawings, protected subject matter
guilds
licensing, Approbation
penalties
privileges, German Imperial
reprints
translations, of contemporary works

Responsible editor
Friedemann Kawohl




Copyright status

Photographic images and scans of public domain documents may be protected under some copyright laws and/or contractual restrictions apply. If you wish to use images of this document in other contexts, please contact the relevant archive (see source). Translation and commentary fall under the project licence (see home page).

Photographic images and scans of public domain documents may be protected under some copyright laws and/or contractual restrictions apply. If you wish to use images of this document in other contexts, please contact the relevant archive (see source). Translation and commentary fall under the project licence (see home page).





Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK