![]() | |||||||
| |
|
||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Core documents by: ![]() Date Place ![]() ![]() Core documents for: ![]() Italy Germany France Britain United States ![]() All documents for: ![]() Italy Germany France Britain United States ![]() Original language: ![]() English French German Italian Latin ![]() Browse documents by: ![]() Person ... by name ... by occupation ... by life dates Place Institution Legislation Case law ![]() Browse commentaries by: ![]() Person ... by name ... by occupation ... by life dates Place Institution Legislation Case law ![]() Browse database by: ![]() Key words ![]() ![]() Editors' login: ![]() | Court of Cassation on sculptures, Paris (1814) Source: Bibliothèque universitaire de Poitiers : Recueil général des lois et des arrêts (Recueil Sirey), 1er série 1791-1830, 4e volume - 1812-1814, 630 Citation: Court of Cassation on sculptures (1841), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org Record Images Commentary Record-ID: f_1814 Full title Robin v. Romagnesi, Court of Cassation. 17 November 1814. Full title original language Robin C. Romagnesi, Cour de cassation. Du 17 novembre 1814. Abstract Article 1 of the law of July 1793 had decreed that the authors of writings of any kind, composers of music, painters, draughtsmen, and engravers were to enjoy an exclusive right to their productions. In the Robin v. Romagnesi case of 1814, the judges of first instance, followed by those of the Court of Cassation, were to interpret the provisions of the revolutionary legislation and the Code Pénal's articles on counterfeiting in the sense that these most certainly did protect works of sculpture, too. Moreover, as an early illustration of something that was to run through all French jurisprudence of the nineteenth century, the judges here also had to settle, as with literary subject matter, on a definition of the artistic work which was susceptible of enjoying the protection of the law. From this perspective, although it was established that the law of 1793 could and should protect a great variety of sculptures, including those of industrial character, carrying out a synthesis of the common criteria for such protection still proved a very delicate task indeed. Bibliography N/A Related documents in this database Author N/A Publisher Sirey Location Paris Year 1841 Language French Source Bibliothèque universitaire de Poitiers : Recueil général des lois et des arrêts (Recueil Sirey), 1er série 1791-1830, 4e volume - 1812-1814, 630 Physical description N/A Illustrations tables N/A Persons referred to Audier-Massillon (fl.1814) Blanc, Etienne (1805-1874) Gastambide, Adrien-Joseph (fl.1837-1860) Louis XVIII (1755-1824) Merlin, Philippe-Antoine (1778-1854) Renouard, Augustin-Charles (1794-1878) Robin, Gabrielle (fl.1814) Romagnesi, Louis Alexander (b.1776) Persons referred to in commentary Antommarchi, Francesco (1780-1838) Blanc, Etienne (1805-1874) Canova, Antonio (1757-1822) Couhin, Claude Raoul (b.1850) Louis XVIII (1755-1824) Merlin, Philippe-Antoine (1778-1854) Napoleon I (1769-1821) Pataille, Jules-Henri-Paul (b.1847) Pouillet, Eugène (1835-1905) Raphael (1483-1529) Robin, Gabrielle (fl.1814) Romagnesi, Louis Alexander (b.1776) Soleau, Eugène (b.1853) Places referred to Paris Places referred to in commentary Angers Épinal Paris Legislation referred to French royal declaration on sculpture and painting (1777) French Copyright Act 1793 Code Pénal 1810 Legislation referred to in commentary French Copyright Act 1793 Code Pénal 1810 Law of 11 March 1902 (France), establishing author's rights for sculptors and designers Law of 14 July 1909 (France), on designs and patterns Cases referred to Romagnesi v. Mlle Robin (1814) Cases referred to in commentary Romagnesi v. Mlle Robin (1814) Fontana case (1857) Institutions referred to Académie de Saint-Luc (Paris) Bibliothèque du Roi (French Royal Library) Court of Cassation (Paris) King's Council of State (France) Parisian Guild of Master Casters and Founders Parisian Guild of Master Painters and Sculptors Parlement of Paris Institutions referred to in commentary Association Littéraire et Artistique Internationale (ALAI) Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Paris Court of Cassation (Paris) Imagerie d'Épinal (factory producing images) Réunion des Fabricants de Bronze (Paris) Royal Academy of Painting and Sculpture (Paris) Tribunal correctionnel de la Seine Key words applied art, protected subject matter authorship, theory of books, protected subject matter copying, concept of counterfeit creativity deposit duration engravings, protected subject matter inheritability originality paintings, protected subject matter penalties, paid to author(s) personality theory replica sculpture, protected subject matter transferability Responsible editor Frédéric Rideau Copyright status Original document is out of copyright. In so far as these scans are protected by copyright, they are made available on the same terms as translations and commentaries (see home page). | ||||||
![]() | |||||||
| Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK | |||||||