Home | Launch conference | Methodology | Editorial board | Acknowledgements | Contact








Core documents by:
Date
Place



Core documents for:
Italy
Germany
France
Britain
United States


All documents for:
Italy
Germany
France
Britain
United States


Original language:
English
French
German
Italian
Latin


Browse documents by:
   Person
... by name
... by occupation
... by life dates

Place
Institution
Legislation
Case law


Browse commentaries by:
   Person
... by name
... by occupation
... by life dates

Place
Institution
Legislation
Case law


Browse database by:
Key words






Editors' login:




Gyles v. Wilcox (Atkyn's Reports), London (1741)

Source:
Lincolns Inn Library: Atkyns, J.T., Chancery Reports, 3 Vols. (London: E. and R. Brooke, 1794), 2: 141

Citation:
Gyles v. Wilcox (Atkyn's Reports) (1741), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Record Images


Record-ID:
uk_1741

Full title
Gyles v. Wilcox, Barrow, and Nutt (1741) 2 Atk. 141

Full title original language
N/A

Abstract
Case in which Lord Hardwicke introduces the concept of the 'fair abridgement', and which is generally regarded as the forerunner to the broader doctrine of 'fair use' developed in the courts throughout the nineteenth century.
The commentary describes the background to the case, in particular the nature of periodical publication throughout the eighteenth century, the rise of the magazine format in the 1730s, as well as relevant case-law both prior to, and following, the decision. The commentary suggests that while the decision in Gyles can be understood as one guided by public interest arguments similar to those informing the rationale behind the Statute of Anne (that is, the encouragement of learning and production of useful books), it can equally be regarded as one in which the court, in effect, expanded the rights of the copyright owner beyond the protections provided by the legislation.

Bibliography
Burrell, R., and Coleman, A., Copyright Exceptions: The Digital Impact (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)
Italia, I., The Rise of Literary Journalism in the Eighteenth Century: Anxious Employment (London & New York: Routledge, 2005)
Vaver, D., "Abridgments and Abstracts: Copyright Implications", European Intellectual Property Review, 17 (1995): 225-235

Related documents in this database

Author
N/A

Publisher
N/A

Location
London

Year
1741

Language
English

Source
Lincolns Inn Library: Atkyns, J.T., Chancery Reports, 3 Vols. (London: E. and R. Brooke, 1794), 2: 141

Physical description
N/A

Illustrations tables
N/A

Persons referred to
Bancks, John (fl.1740)
Gyles, Fletcher (fl.1741)
Hale, Sir Matthew (1609-1676)
Hodges, James (d.1774)
Peter I, the Great (1672-1725)
Read, Thomas (fl.1729)
Yorke, Philip, 1st Earl of Hardwicke (1690-1764)

Persons referred to in commentary
Anne (1665-1714)
Atkyns, John Tracey (1706-1773)
Barnardiston, Thomas (1706-1752)
Burnet, Gilbert (1690-1726)
Burnet, Dr. Thomas (c.1635-1715)
Cave, Edward (1691-1754)
Clarke, Sir Thomas (1703/04-1764)
Defoe, Daniel (1660-1731)
Eldon, John Scott, 1st Earl of (1751-1838)
Ellenborough, Edward Law, 1st Baron (1750-1818)
Haywood, Eliza (c.1693-1756)
Hodges, James (d.1774)
Hyde, Edward, 1st Earl of Clarendon (1609-1674)
Johnson, Samuel (1709-1784)
Motley, John (fl.1741)
Parker, Thomas (1667-1732)
Shadwell, Lancelot (1779-1850)
Trapp, Dr. Joseph (1679-1747)
Yorke, Philip, 1st Earl of Hardwicke (1690-1764)

Places referred to
N/A

Places referred to in commentary
N/A

Legislation referred to
Statute of Anne, 1710, 8 Anne, c.19

Legislation referred to in commentary
Statute of Anne, 1710, 8 Anne, c.19
Engravers' Copyright Act, 1735, 8 Geo.II, c.13
Copyright Act, 1911, 1 & 2 Geo.V, c.46

Cases referred to
Read v. Hodges (1740) NA, c.11 538/36

Cases referred to in commentary
Burnet v. Chetwood (1721) 2 Mer. 441
Austen v. Cave (1739) NA, c.11 1552/3
Read v. Hodges (1740) NA, c.11 538/36
Gyles v. Wilcox (1741) 2 Atk. 141
Pope v. Curl (1741) 2 Atk. 342
Cogan v. Cave (1743) NA, c.33 379/485, 521, 547, c.33 383/69
Tonson v. Walker (1752) NA, c.11 1106/18, 3 Swans 672
Dodsley v. Kinnersley (1761) Amb. 403
Cary v. Kearsley (1804) 4 Esp. 168
Wilkins v. Aikin (1810) 17 Ves. Jun. 422
Whittingham v. Wooler (1817) 2 Swanst. 428
Campbell v. Scott (1842) 6 Jur. 186

Institutions referred to
House of Lords

Institutions referred to in commentary
Court of Chancery

Key words
abridgements
anthologies
fair use
learning, the advancement of
property theory, authors' property
scholarly writing

Responsible editor
Ronan Deazley




Copyright status

Original document is out of copyright. In so far as these scans are protected by copyright, they are made available on the same terms as translations and commentaries (see home page).




Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK