![]() | |||||||
| |
|
||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Core documents by: ![]() Date Place ![]() ![]() Core documents for: ![]() Italy Germany France Britain United States ![]() All documents for: ![]() Italy Germany France Britain United States ![]() Original language: ![]() English French German Italian Latin ![]() Browse documents by: ![]() Person ... by name ... by occupation ... by life dates Place Institution Legislation Case law ![]() Browse commentaries by: ![]() Person ... by name ... by occupation ... by life dates Place Institution Legislation Case law ![]() Browse database by: ![]() Key words ![]() ![]() Editors' login: ![]() | Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony, Napoleon Sarony (1883) Source: The University of Texas Tarlton Law Library Stack 215: Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony, 111 U.S. 53 (1883). Citation: Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony (1883), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org Record Images Record-ID: us_1883 Full title Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony, 111 U.S. 53 Full title original language N/A Abstract A Supreme Court decision on the issue of copyright protection of photographs. The decision rejected various challenged to the copyrightability of a photograph of Oscar including a claim of lack of originality based on the alleged mechanical nature of photography. While the decision rejected the originality challenge, it construed the originality requirement in broad terms that questioned the eligibility for copyright protection of many other photographic works. Bibliography Farley, Christine Haight. "Copyright Law's Response to the Invention of Photography." 65 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 385 (2004). Panzer, Mary. Mathew Brady and the image of history. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press for the National Portrait Gallery, 1997. Related documents in this database Author N/A Publisher N/A Location Napoleon Sarony Year 1883 Language English Source The University of Texas Tarlton Law Library Stack 215: Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony, 111 U.S. 53 (1883). Physical description N/A Illustrations tables N/A Persons referred to Bouvier, John (1787-1851) Bowen, Charles Synge Christopher (1835-1894) Brett, William Baliol, 1st Viscount Esher (1817-1899) Calman, David (fl.1883) Cotton, Sir Henry (1821-1892) Gurlitz, Augustus T. (fl.1883-1901) Mansfield, William Murray, 1st Earl (1705-1793) Miller, Samuel Freeman (1816-1890) Sarony, Napoleon (1821-1896) Wilde, Oscar Fingall O'Flahertie Wills (1854-1900) Persons referred to in commentary N/A Places referred to Great Britain London New York Places referred to in commentary N/A Legislation referred to Statute of Anne, 1710, 8 Ann. c. 19 U.S. Copyright Act 1790, 1 Stat. 124 (1790) U.S. Copyright Act 1802 (Amendment of 1790 Act), 2 Stat. 171 (1802) U.S. Copyright Act 1831, 21st Cong., 2d Sess., 4 Stat. 436 Fine Art Copyright Act, 1862, 25 & 26 Vict., c.68 U.S. Print and Label Law, Amendatory Act of June 18, 1874, 18 Stat. 78 Legislation referred to in commentary N/A Cases referred to Millar v. Taylor (1769) 4 Burr. 2303 Nottage v. Jackson, 11 Q.B.D. 627 (1883) Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony, 111 U.S. 53 (1883) Cases referred to in commentary N/A Institutions referred to Court of King's Bench House of Lords Library of Congress New York District Court U.S. Congress Institutions referred to in commentary N/A Key words authorship, theory of constitution, US creativity idea/expression labour theory originality patents, for invention photography, protected subject matter piracy portrait Responsible editor Oren Bracha Copyright status Original document is out of copyright. In so far as these scans are protected by copyright, they are made available on the same terms as translations and commentaries (see home page). | ||||||
![]() | |||||||
| Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK | |||||||