Home | Launch conference | Methodology | Editorial board | Acknowledgements | Contact








Core documents by:
Date
Place



Core documents for:
Italy
Germany
France
Britain
United States


All documents for:
Italy
Germany
France
Britain
United States


Original language:
English
French
German
Italian
Latin


Browse documents by:
   Person
... by name
... by occupation
... by life dates

Place
Institution
Legislation
Case law


Browse commentaries by:
   Person
... by name
... by occupation
... by life dates

Place
Institution
Legislation
Case law


Browse database by:
Key words






Editors' login:




Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony, Napoleon Sarony (1883)

Source:
The University of Texas Tarlton Law Library Stack 215: Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony, 111 U.S. 53 (1883).

Citation:
Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony (1883), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Record Images


Record-ID:
us_1883

Full title
Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony, 111 U.S. 53

Full title original language
N/A

Abstract
A Supreme Court decision on the issue of copyright protection of photographs. The decision rejected various challenged to the copyrightability of a photograph of Oscar including a claim of lack of originality based on the alleged mechanical nature of photography. While the decision rejected the originality challenge, it construed the originality requirement in broad terms that questioned the eligibility for copyright protection of many other photographic works.

Bibliography
Farley, Christine Haight. "Copyright Law's Response to the Invention of Photography." 65 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 385 (2004).
Panzer, Mary. Mathew Brady and the image of history. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press for the National Portrait Gallery, 1997.

Related documents in this database

Author
N/A

Publisher
N/A

Location
Napoleon Sarony

Year
1883

Language
English

Source
The University of Texas Tarlton Law Library Stack 215: Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony, 111 U.S. 53 (1883).

Physical description
N/A

Illustrations tables
N/A

Persons referred to
Bouvier, John (1787-1851)
Bowen, Charles Synge Christopher (1835-1894)
Brett, William Baliol, 1st Viscount Esher (1817-1899)
Calman, David (fl.1883)
Cotton, Sir Henry (1821-1892)
Gurlitz, Augustus T. (fl.1883-1901)
Mansfield, William Murray, 1st Earl (1705-1793)
Miller, Samuel Freeman (1816-1890)
Sarony, Napoleon (1821-1896)
Wilde, Oscar Fingall O'Flahertie Wills (1854-1900)

Persons referred to in commentary
N/A

Places referred to
Great Britain
London
New York

Places referred to in commentary
N/A

Legislation referred to
Statute of Anne, 1710, 8 Ann. c. 19
U.S. Copyright Act 1790, 1 Stat. 124 (1790)
U.S. Copyright Act 1802 (Amendment of 1790 Act), 2 Stat. 171 (1802)
U.S. Copyright Act 1831, 21st Cong., 2d Sess., 4 Stat. 436
Fine Art Copyright Act, 1862, 25 & 26 Vict., c.68
U.S. Print and Label Law, Amendatory Act of June 18, 1874, 18 Stat. 78

Legislation referred to in commentary
N/A

Cases referred to
Millar v. Taylor (1769) 4 Burr. 2303
Nottage v. Jackson, 11 Q.B.D. 627 (1883)
Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony, 111 U.S. 53 (1883)

Cases referred to in commentary
N/A

Institutions referred to
Court of King's Bench
House of Lords
Library of Congress
New York District Court
U.S. Congress

Institutions referred to in commentary
N/A

Key words
authorship, theory of
constitution, US
creativity
idea/expression
labour theory
originality
patents, for invention
photography, protected subject matter
piracy
portrait

Responsible editor
Oren Bracha




Copyright status

Original document is out of copyright. In so far as these scans are protected by copyright, they are made available on the same terms as translations and commentaries (see home page).




Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK