# Primary Sources on Copyright - Record Viewer
Wächter: 'Publishing Right', Stuttgart (1857)

Source: Scanned from a copy held in the Frankfurt Max-Planck-Institut für Europäische Rechtsgeschichte

Citation:
Wächter: 'Publishing Right', Stuttgart (1857), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | Commentaries: [1]
Translation only | Transcription only | Show all | Bundled images as pdf

            Chapter 1 Page 2 of 94 total




90


      The second aspect, that is, the author’s intellectual interest
does not fall into the sphere of law,* but rather into that of
morality and the intellectual significance (of his work). For it
is not the the internal or individual interests and intentions of
the author which publishing right is meant to protect. The law is
indifferent to such subjective considerations and to include them
in a juristic treatment (of the matter) would only confuse things.
      It is true that some, Bluntschli for example,** consider the
author’s personal, esp. literary, interest and the artist's honour***
to be a necessary principle in the protection of rights.****
Nevertheless, the realm to which publishing right is applicable is
not that of the mind, but, rather, the sphere of material circulation.
It is not from his ideas, which he was the first to think of, develop,
and express, that an author wishes to exclude others, for ideas by
their very nature are not subject to legal control. Once they have
been brought into literary circulation, they immediately become
common property and elements from which new works of the intellect
can arise. It is not this intellectual circulation which

_____________________

*
** Bluntschli 1853
*** Bluntschli 1853
**** Bluntschli 1853

    


No Transcription available.

Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) is co-published by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK and CREATe, School of Law, University of Glasgow, 10 The Square, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK