# Primary Sources on Copyright - Record Viewer
High Court of Justice on the Right to Copy of Evangelical Hymns, The Hague (1813)

Source: Het letterkundig eigendomsregt in Nederland: wetten, traktaten, regtspraak: benevens de wetgeving op de drukpers in Nederland en Nederlandsch Indië Vereeniging ter bevordering van de belangen des boekhandels, ’s Gravenhage: Belinfante 1865-1867, I (1865), pp. 91-93; Bijzondere Collecties, Universiteitsbibliotheek van Amsterdam, UBM KVB 6730:1

Citation:
High Court of Justice on the Right to Copy of Evangelical Hymns, The Hague (1813), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | No Commentaries
Translation only | Transcription only | Show all | Bundled images as pdf
            Chapter 1 Page 1 of 3 total

91

[...]

II. COPYRIGHT OF EVANGELICAL HYMNS.

HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE HAGUE.
First Civil Chamber.
Hearing of Monday 11 January 1813.

John Enschede and Son, book printers, residing in Haarlem, appellants, with records of appeal dated 6th November 1812, by ordinance and referral of the President of the Tribunal of first instance in Haarlem, of 23 October 1812, appearing in court with William van der Jagt, Master of Law, their counsel, versus Johannes Allart, bookseller, residing in The Hague, respondent, appearing with Matthys Hendrik van Son, Master of Law, his counsel.

The Court, having heard the parties,

Having heard the Advocate-General Philipse in his advisory opinion, to the effect that the Court in the Judgment would overturn the appeal and furthermore reject the motion of incompetence

    

91

[...]

II. KOPIJREGT DER EVANGELISCHE GEZANGEN.

HOOG GEREGTSHOF VAN 's GRAVENHAGE.
Eerste civiele kamer.
Zitting van Maandag 11 Januarij 1813.

Johannes Enschede en Zoon, boekdrukkers, wonende te Haarlem, appellanten, bij acten van appel in dato den 6 November 1812, van eene ordonnantie en refere van den President van de vierschaar van eerste instantie te Haarlem, van den 23 October 1812, comparerende bij Mr. Willem van der Jagt, hunnen avoue, tegen Johannes Allart, boekhandelaar, wonende in den Haag, geintimeerde, comparerende bij Mr. Matthys Hendrik van Son, zijnen avoue.

Het Hof, partijen gehoord,

Gehoord den Advokaat-Generaal Philipse in zijne conclusien, strekkende, dat het Hof bij arrest zou te niet doen het appel en voorts rejecteren de exceptie van incompetentie,


    

Our Partners

Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.

Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) is co-published by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK and CREATe, School of Law, University of Glasgow, 10 The Square, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK