Letters from Sumner to Story, Washington D.C. (1834)

Source: Library of Congress, Joseph Story Papers

Citation:
Letters from Sumner to Story, Washington D.C. (1834), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | No Commentaries
Translation only | Transcription only | Show all | Bundled images as pdf

            Chapter 1 Page 1 of 8 total



No Translation available.


                                                                                                                  March 19, 1834

                              Supreme Court Room
                                                      Wednesday

My Dear Judge Story,
                              The opinion of the Court has just been delivered in
the case of Wheaton V. Peters. The appearance of the parties &
of the different judges I have thought could be interesting to
you as an individual & as a judge - Judge
McLean, of course, read the opinion of the Court, which
appeared to me able & well considered, much
above my estimate of his powers. Mr. Wheaton
appeared strongly excited during its reading. Mr.
P[eters] was anxious but perfectly calm. Upon
its reading being finished, Judge Thompson said that he
differed from the Court - that in question was one of
the most important ever decided - that he
had not written out his opinion - but could
give [XXX] purport of it. He spoke with
much feeling - supporting a common law
property of an author - & adopting Webster's argument
on the requisites of a St[atute]. As to this last
point he said the court were equally divided,
so far as the operation of the St[atute] of 1802 went.
Judge Baldwin followed, expressing his hope,
that he should not have been obliged during
this term to have given an opinion, assenting

    

Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK