The Humble Remonstrance of the Stationers' Company, London (1643)

Source: Durham University Library: Arber, E., A Transcript of the Registers of the Company of Stationers of London, 1557-1640, 5 vols. (London: n.p., 1875-94) 1: 584

Citation:
The Humble Remonstrance of the Stationers' Company, London (1643), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | Commentaries: [1]
Record-ID: uk_1643

Permanent link: http://www.copyrighthistory.org/record/uk_1643

Full title:
The Humble Remonstrance of the Company of Stationers to the High Court of Parliament

Full title original language:
N/A

Abstract:
A petition from the Stationers' Company to Parliament to introduce some form of legislative regulation of the press. The petition is significant in revealing the extent to which the Stationers depended upon the state to support the regulation of the book trade, as well as the nature of the various public and private interest arguments upon which they sought to base their claim. The benefits of the legal regulation they suggested concerned not only the censorship and suppression of seditious and heretical texts, but also facilitated the advancement of learning and knowledge and the flourishing of the printing industry itself. In addition, the petition presents the figure of the 'author' as reliant upon the benefit of his work, and that the 'production of the Brain' was to be regarded as equivalent to any other commodity or chattel.

1 Commentary:
commentary_uk_1643

Bibliography:
  • Siebert, F.S., Freedom of the Press in England 1476-1776 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1965)

  • Patterson, L.R., Copyright in Historical Perspective (Nashville: Vanderbilt University, 1968)

  • Clyde, W.M., 'Parliament and the Press, 1643-47', The Library, 13 (1932-33): 399-424

  • Bracha, O., Owning Ideas: A History of Anglo-American Intellectual Property, http://www.obracha.net/oi/oi.htm


Related documents in this database:
1545: Venetian Decree on Author-Printer Relations
1643: An Ordinance for the Regulation of Printing
1647: Ordinance against Unlicensed or Scandalous Pamphlets
1649: An Act against Unlicensed and Scandalous Books and Pamphlets
1653: An Act for reviving [the 1649 Act]

Author: Henry Parker

Publisher: N/A

Year: 1643

Location: London

Language: English

Source: Durham University Library: Arber, E., A Transcript of the Registers of the Company of Stationers of London, 1557-1640, 5 vols. (London: n.p., 1875-94) 1: 584

Persons referred to:
Catlyn, Sir Robert
Dyer
Edward VI
Elizabeth I
Henry VIII
James I
Lucaris, Cyril
Preston, John
Richard III
Sibbes, Richard
Socinus, Faustus
Socinus, Laelius

Places referred to:
China
Constantinople
England
Europe
France
Geneva
Germany
London
Lyon
Moscow
Netherlands
Paris
Poland
Turkey

Cases referred to:
N/A

Institutions referred to:
High Commission
Parliament
Star Chamber
Stationers' Company
University of Cambridge
University of Oxford

Legislation:
Star Chamber Decree 1566
Star Chamber Decree 1586

Keywords:
Stationers' Company
authorship, legal concept of
barter trade
guild regulation
learning, the advancement of
lobbying
printing, history of
property theory, publishers' property
reprints
utility

Responsible editor: Ronan Deazley


Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK