Tonson v. Walker, London (1751)

Source: The National Archives c.11 1106/18

Citation:
Tonson v. Walker, London (1751), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | No Commentaries
Record-ID: uk_1751

Permanent link: http://www.copyrighthistory.org/record/uk_1751

Full title:
Tonson v. Walker (1751) NA c.11 1106/18

Full title original language:
N/A

Abstract:
This document is associated with the following core document: uk_1667

Commentary: No commentaries for this record.

Bibliography:
N/A

Related documents in this database:
1618: Daniel's The Collection of the Historie of England
1667: Milton's Contract

Author: N/A

Publisher: n.p.

Year: 1751

Location: London

Language: English

Source: The National Archives c.11 1106/18

Persons referred to:

Addison, Joseph
Aylmer, Brabazon
Bently, Richard
Birt, Samuel
Brindley, John
Chandler, Richard
Corbett, Charles
Dodd, Benjamin
Draper, Somerset
Feales, William
Fenton, Elijah
George II
Hayman, Mr.
Hitch, Charles
Hodges, James
Hutton, James
Lightbody, John
Longman, Thomas, I
Marchant, John
Milton, John
Newton, Thomas
Paterson, James
Pearce, Zachary
Poulson, John
Richardson, Samuel
Simmons, Samuel
Styles, Joseph
Tickell, Thomas
Tonson, Jacob
Tonson, Jacob, 'the Elder'
Tonson, Jacob, 'the Younger'
Tonson, Richard
Walker, Robert
Ward, Aaron
Ward, John
Watts, John
Wellington, Bethel
Wellington, Richard
Wicksteed, Edward
Woodfall, Henry
Yorke, Philip, 1st Earl of Hardwicke

Places referred to:
London
Middlesex

Cases referred to:
N/A

Institutions referred to:
Court of Chancery
Stationers' Company

Legislation:
N/A

Keywords:
book trade
contract
divisibility
editions, new
foreign reprints
ingenuity
inheritability
subscription
transferability

Responsible editor: Ronan Deazley


Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK