Commentary on:
Hegel: Remarks on Intellectual Property (1821)

Back | Commentary info | Commentary
Printer friendly version
Creative Commons License
This work by www.copyrighthistory.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900)

www.copyrighthistory.org

Identifier: d_1821

 

           

Hegel: Remarks on Intellectual Property, Berlin (1821)

Friedemann Kawohl

School of Finance & Law, Bournemouth University, UK

 

Please cite as:
Kawohl, F. (2008) ‘Commentary on Hegel's Remarks on Intellectual Property, Berlin (1821), in Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

 

1. Full title

2. Abstract

3. References

 

1. Full title

Remarks on Intellectual Property as published in the First Part ("Abstract Rights") of Hegel's Elements of the Philosophy of Rights (Chapter: "Property", section: "Alienation", sub-sections 41-43 & 61-71) plus Hegel's own handwritten annotations (title-page, pp.47,48, 63-76)

 

2. Abstract

The justification of copyright through a personality argument as presented by Georg Friedrich Wilhelm Hegel is often regarded as the "most powerful alternative to a Lockean model of property".[1] Hegel's remarks on intellectual property were printed as part of his Elements of the Philosophy of Rights, a book that was based on the lectures he gave at the University of Berlin between 1818 and 1831. The document presented in our digital archive is a private copy of the first print edition of 1821 that was annotated by Hegel himself for use in subsequent lectures. In Hegel's view, property is something that enables the exercise of subjective freedom rather than a consequence of civil liberties.[2] Thus, literary property is also a manifestation of a person's free will. Hegel's concept of individual, personal rights as a basis of copyright was influenced by Kant and Fichte and had some bearing on the later theories of Gareis, Gierke and Bluntschli, even if Hegel's legal theory was not referred to generally by German jurists in the second half of the nineteenth century.

 

3. References

 

Books and articles [in alphabetical order]

Drahos P., A Philosophy of Intellectual Property (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1996)

Hughes, J., "The philosophy of Intellectual Property", The Georgetown LJ 77 (1988): 287-366

Schroeder, J. L., "Unnatural Rights: Hegel and Intellectual Property", Cardozo Law School, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 80 (2004)



[1] Justin Hughes, "The philosophy of Intellectual Property", The Georgetown LJ 77 (1988): 287-366.

[2] Cf. Peter Drahos, A Philosophy of Intellectual Property (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1996)


Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK