# Primary Sources on Copyright - Record Viewer
Pütter: The Reprinting of Books, Göttingen (1774)

Source: Max-Planck-Institut für Europäische Rechtsgeschichte, Frankfurt Dt 15 Li 1

Citation:
Pütter: The Reprinting of Books, Göttingen (1774), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | Commentaries: [1]
Translation only | Transcription only | Show all | Bundled images as pdf

            Chapter 1 Page 3 of 219 total



It is only the universal freedom to reprint books, which for some time
has not only found proponents now and then but is also beginning to be
put into practice quite a lot, that to me seems worth the effort of
examining it in the light of true principles of law and in more detail
than has been the case so far. I would by no means consider the time and
effort spent on this to have been in vain, if those who until now may
perhaps not have looked into this matter in all its circumstances were
moved to do so by the present book.
            At the time that I took up my pen and when printing of this
book had already begun, I could not foresee then that this very question
would acquire such importance in England. Perhaps the presentation of my
arguments would have benefited if I had been able to wait and see what
the British Parliament will decide upon regarding the booksellers’
petition that was recently put forward to it.
            If the German Imperial constitution presented less difficulties
in the way of establishing a settlement that would hold throughout the
whole Empire, and, similarly, allowing full execution of an Imperial
settlement once it had been reached, the issue at stake would unquestionably
be as worthy of the attention of a general Imperial Diet as it is of
the British Parliament.
            As it is, it would be sufficient if only more of the various
Imperial Estates were to issue decrees like those of the Electorate of
Saxony and the Imperial City of Nuremberg, cited as examples in this
book (§.178 and §.154 a, respectively), or even if they were just to
let themselves be guided by

    


No Transcription available.

Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) is co-published by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK and CREATe, School of Law, University of Glasgow, 10 The Square, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK