# Primary Sources on Copyright - Record Viewer
Beaumarchais's petition, Paris (1791)

Source: Bibliothèque Universitaire de Poitiers (SCD) : Oeuvres complètes de Beaumarchais, tome sixième, Paris, Furne, 1826.

Citation:
Beaumarchais's petition, Paris (1791), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | No Commentaries
Translation only | Transcription only | Show all | Bundled images as pdf

            Chapter 1 Page 24 of 26 total




218                        PETITION

taken in favour of mores did not relate at all to their property, neither giving it nor
taking it, but granting it to no one else. How dare one plead from a uniquely moral
phrase, in order to usurp a property? If such a law existed, that deprived authors of
the property of their plays as soon as they have them printed or engraved, no author
would have his works printed; there would be nothing left for public instruction; all
the printers and engravers would be ruined by this law. These sorry reasoners, who
direct the troupes and live off the talent of actors and of authors, would become even
worse off themselves; for, independently of the price of these works, that they could
no longer steal from the authors, they would have to have made as many copies by
hand, at three louis for the spoken plays, instead of twenty-four or twelve sous that the
printing comes to; instead of the eighteen francs that the play with engraved music
costs them, they would spend twenty-five louis for each score with separate parts.
This is when, Sirs, they would cry out loudly! This impolitic measure, having taken
the shape of law, would be fatal for all the Empire.
      I believe that I have effectively answered all the false assertions of the directors
of our spectacles.
      In presenting myself alone, I have destroyed in one word the futile appearance
of a supposed corporation.


    


No Transcription available.

Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) is co-published by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK and CREATe, School of Law, University of Glasgow, 10 The Square, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK