# Primary Sources on Copyright - Record Viewer
Beaumarchais's petition, Paris (1791)

Source: Bibliothèque Universitaire de Poitiers (SCD) : Oeuvres complètes de Beaumarchais, tome sixième, Paris, Furne, 1826.

Citation:
Beaumarchais's petition, Paris (1791), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | No Commentaries
Translation only | Transcription only | Show all | Bundled images as pdf

            Chapter 1 Page 3 of 26 total




TO THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY                        197


gentler, unfortunately for the cause and for our ardent adversaries.
      A first observation has struck everyone. It is, one says, very strange that a
formal law was necessary to attest to all of France that the property of a dramatic
author belongs to him; that no one has the right to take possession of it. This
principle, derived from the first rights of man, went so much without saying for all the
properties of man acquired by work, donation, sale, or heredity, that one would have
thought it very derisory to be obliged to establish it by law. My property alone, as
dramatic author, more sacred than all others as it comes to me from no one and is not
subject to dispute for deceit, or fraud, or seduction, the work coming from my brain,
as Minerva fully armed from that of the master of gods; only my property has needed
that a law pronounce that it is mine, assuring me the possession of it. But those who
observe thus have not understood the text of the law.
      It is true that one did not dare say to me: The work that has come from you is
not of you. But the theatre directors have laid down this other principle: Dramatic
author, they have said, the work that has come from you is of you, but it is not yours.
You will obtain no fruit from it: it is ours; as for the past hundred years, by a long
succession of abuses of a depredatory regime and your established weakness, we have
been entitled to enrich ourselves


    


No Transcription available.

Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) is co-published by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK and CREATe, School of Law, University of Glasgow, 10 The Square, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK