Tonson v. Collins, London (1762)

Source: Lincoln's Inn Library

Citation:
Tonson v. Collins, London (1762), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | Commentaries: [1]
Record-ID: uk_1762

Permanent link: http://www.copyrighthistory.org/record/uk_1762

Full title:
Tonson v. Collins (1762) 1 Black W. 321

Full title original language:
N/A

Abstract:
Significant case in which the arguments for and against the existence of copyright at common law were extensively debated for the first time before the Court of King's Bench. Both William Blackstone (author of Commentaries Upon the Laws of England, and one of the judges to hold in favour of the common law right in Donaldson v. Becket (1774) (uk_1774)) and Joseph Yates (who would later provide the dissenting opinion in Millar v. Taylor (1769) (uk_1769)) appeared on behalf of the plaintiff and the defendant respectively.

1 Commentary:
commentary_uk_1762

Bibliography:
  • Rose, M., Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright (London, Harvard University Press, 1993)

  • Feather, J., Publishing, Piracy and Politics: An Historical Study of Copyright in Britain (London, Mansell, 1994)

  • Deazley, R., On the Origin of the Right to Copy: Charting the Movement of Copyright Law in Eighteenth-Century Britain (1695-1775) (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004)


Related documents in this database:
1761: Tonson v. Collins
1762: An Enquiry into Literary Property
1762: A Vindication of the Rights of Authors
1766: Blackstone's Commentaries, Vol.II (selected extracts)

Author: N/A

Publisher: N/A

Year: 1762

Location: London

Language: English

Source: Lincoln's Inn Library

Persons referred to:
Allestree, Richard
Anne
Apelles
Bacon, Francis
Bagford, John
Blackstone, William
Bynkershoek, Cornelis van
Caesar, Gaius Julius
Coke, Sir Edward
Collins, Benjamin
Grotius, Hugo
Harcourt, Simon, 1st Viscount
Hoyle, Edmond
Hyde, Edward, 1st Earl of Clarendon
James I
Jekyll, Joseph
Juvenal, Decimus Junius Juvenalis
Kames, Henry Home, Lord
Locke, John
Mansfield, William Murray, 1st Earl
Menander
Milton, John
Nelson, Robert
Newton, Sir Isaac
Newton, Thomas
Numa Pompilius
Parker, Thomas
Parrhasius
Pemberton, Sir Francis
Pope, Alexander
Prideaux, Humphrey
Pufendorf, Samuel, Freiherr von
Rolle, Henry
Romulus
Roscius, Quintus
Seymour, Sir Edward
Statius, Publius Papinius
Steele, Sir Richard
Swift, Jonathan
Talbot, Charles, 1st Baron Talbot
Terence
Thurlow, Edward, 1st Baron
Tonson, Jacob
Tottell, Richard
Warburton, William
Yorke, Philip, 1st Earl of Hardwicke

Places referred to:
N/A

Cases referred to:
N/A

Institutions referred to:
Court of Chancery
Court of King's Bench
House of Lords
See of Canterbury
Stationers' Company
Stationers' Hall

Legislation:
Licensing Act, 1662, 13 & 14 Car.II, c.33
Licensing Act, 1685, 1 Jac.II, c.17
Magna Carta, 1297, 25 Edw.I, c.9
Statute of Anne, 1710, 8 Anne, c.19
Statute of Monopolies, 1624, 21 Jac.I, c.3

Keywords:
common law copyright
copying, concept of
idea/expression
inventions
labour theory
natural rights
originality
patents, for invention
patents, printing
privileges
property analogies
property theory
property theory, authors' property
public domain
public performance
reprints
scribal publication
utility

Responsible editor: Ronan Deazley


Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK