Blackstone's Commentaries, Vol.II (selected extracts), Oxford (1766)

Source: National Editor's personal collection: Facsimile Edition (Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 1979)

Citation:
Blackstone's Commentaries, Vol.II (selected extracts), Oxford (1766), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | No Commentaries
Record-ID: uk_1766a

Permanent link: http://www.copyrighthistory.org/record/uk_1766a

Full title:
William Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England, Vol.II, 400-407

Full title original language:
N/A

Abstract:
This document is associated with the following core document: uk_1762

Commentary: No commentaries for this record.

Bibliography:
N/A

Related documents in this database:
1761: Tonson v. Collins
1762: Tonson v. Collins
1762: An Enquiry into Literary Property
1762: A Vindication of the Rights of Authors

Author: William Blackstone

Publisher: Clarendon Press

Year: 1766

Location: Oxford

Language: English

Source: National Editor's personal collection: Facsimile Edition (Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 1979)

Persons referred to:
Anne
Blackstone, William
Bracton, Henry de
Bynkershoek, Cornelis van
Finch, Sir Henry
Grotius, Hugo
Henry III
Locke, John
Martial, Marcus Valerius Martialis
Statius, Publius Papinius
Terence

Places referred to:
England

Cases referred to:
Baller v. Watson (1737)
Duke of Queensbury v. Shebbeare (1758) 2 Eden 329
Eyre v. Walker (1735) NA, c.11 1520/29
Forester v. Walker (1741) NA, c.11 867/54
Knaplock v. Curl (1722) NA, c.11 690
Motte v. Faulkner (1735) NA, c.11 2249/4
Pope v. Curl (1741) 2 Atk. 342
Tonson v. Walker (1739) NA, c.33 1753/208
Tonson v. Walker (1752) 3 Swans 672
Walthoe v. Walker (1736) NA, c.11 1534/62
Webb v. Rose (1732) NA, c.11 1881/156

Institutions referred to:
Court of Chancery

Legislation:
Engravers' Copyright Act, 1735, 8 Geo.II, c.13
Statute of Anne, 1710, 8 Anne, c.19
Statute of Monopolies, 1624, 21 Jac.I, c.3

Keywords:
labour theory
property theory
property theory, authors' property

Responsible editor: Ronan Deazley


Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK