Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (20 March), London (1862)

Source: University of Birmingham Library: Hansard, 3rd Ser., vol.165, 1889-93

Citation:
Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (20 March), London (1862), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | No Commentaries
Record-ID: uk_1862c

Permanent link: http://www.copyrighthistory.org/record/uk_1862c

Full title:
Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act: Hansard, 3rd Ser., 165 (1862): 1889-1893 (20 March)

Full title original language:
N/A

Abstract:
This document is associated with the following core document: uk_1862

Commentary: No commentaries for this record.

Bibliography:
N/A

Related documents in this database:
1853: Blaine's Laws of Artistic Copyright
1858: Report of the Artistic Copyright Committee
1861: Fine Art Copyright Bill
1861: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Bill (6 May)
1862: Fine Art Copyright Act
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (28 Feb.)
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (6 March)
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (31 March)
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (22 May)
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (23 May)
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (5 June)
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (24 July)
1862: Fine Art Copyright Bill (27 Feb.)
1862: Fine Art Copyright Bill (20 March)

Author: N/A

Publisher: N/A

Year: 1862

Location: London

Language: English

Source: University of Birmingham Library: Hansard, 3rd Ser., vol.165, 1889-93

Persons referred to:
Cavendish-Scott-Bentinck, Lord Henry William
Coningham, William
Henley, Joseph Warner
Hennessy, Sir John Pope
Lewis, John Harvey
Palmer, Roundell, 1st Earl of Selborne
Ridley, Matthew White, 1st Viscount Ridley
White, James

Places referred to:
Crimea
Egypt
Syria

Cases referred to:
N/A

Institutions referred to:
House of Commons
Stationers' Hall

Legislation:
N/A

Keywords:
authenticity
drawings, protected subject matter
fraud
imitation
paintings, protected subject matter
penalties, paid to author(s)
photography, protected subject matter
portrait
registration

Responsible editor: Ronan Deazley


Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK