Pope's Bill of Complaint, and Curl's Answer, London (1741)

Source: The National Archives: c.11 1569/29

Pope's Bill of Complaint, and Curl's Answer, London (1741), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer,

Back | Record | Images | No Commentaries
Record-ID: uk_1741c

Permanent link:

Full title:
Alexander Pope's Bill of Complaint, and Edmund Curl's Answer

Full title original language:

This document is associated with the following core document: uk_1741a

Commentary: No commentaries for this record.


Related documents in this database:
1741: Pope v. Curl
1741: Pope v Curl: Entry from the Court's Book of Orders

Author: N/A

Publisher: Unpublished

Year: 1741

Location: London

Language: English

Source: The National Archives: c.11 1569/29

Persons referred to:
Arbuthnot, John
Atterbury, Francis
Bolingbroke, Henry St John, 1st Viscount
Curl, Edmund
Douglas, Catherine
Douglas, Charles, 3rd Duke of Queensberry
Faulkener, George
Gay, John
George II
Goode, Barnham
Pope, Alexander
Swift, Jonathan
Wotton, William
Yorke, Philip, 1st Earl of Hardwicke

Places referred to:
Covent Garden

Cases referred to:

Institutions referred to:
St Paul's Church

Statute of Anne, 1710, 8 Anne, c.19

authorship, legal concept of
private domain
property theory, authors' property
unpublished works

Responsible editor: Ronan Deazley

Copyright History resource developed in partnership with:

Our Partners

Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (

With the exception of commentaries that are available under a CC-BY licence (compliant with UKRI policy) you may not publish individual documents or parts of the database for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.

Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) is co-published by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK and CREATe, School of Law, University of Glasgow, 10 The Square, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK