# Primary Sources on Copyright - Record Viewer
'Pezzana e Consorti' case: counter-petition and rulings, Venice (1781)

Source: N/A

Citation:
'Pezzana e Consorti' case: counter-petition and rulings, Venice (1781), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | No Commentaries
Translation only | Transcription only | Show all | Bundled images as pdf

            Chapter 1 Page 3 of 20 total



decree of 1533.
      "An exclusive privilege, the Senate adds in 1537,
removes competition and rivalry, but it is these which are the mother of
all industry; the pretext of corrections and augmentations is devised, in order
to surreptitiously obtain new privileges for the same book"
, and in the year
1603, when regulating the terms and duration of privileges only for books
being printed for the first time, it re-affirmed for all the others the principle
of liberty [of reprinting], which is the principle that has constantly been opted
for at all times.
      It is on these principles, which are the fruit of experience and reason,
that all the measures of this Tribunal, which has fortunately been chosen to
protect the welfare of this Art, have turned upon. A series of rulings which
have been issued in the course of the current century have always proscribed
the abuse of privileges; and if in the year 1762 [?] the printing offices in the
Republic's mainland domains were forbidden to reprint the books of the
City of Venice's publishers whose privileges were just about to expire; this
was an act designed to give preference to the Venetian presses, whose
original liberty was left intact, so that each house might, in proportion to its
funds and diligence, expand its business; and if anyone subsequently imagined
that, by invoking peculiar schemes and circumstances, he would be able
to secure a further extension of his privilege, the justice of this Most Exc.
Magistracy, having carried out judicial comparisons of all the facts pertaining
to this matter, has forbidden any misuses, and the liberty of printing has
been enshrined by solemn judgment, as happened in the year 1763.
      The person who with great audacity and trickery defended the claims
of the Prior of the Guild and his associates knew very well the importance
of such uniform and steadfast acts of legislation which pride themselves in
imitating the most cultivated nations of Europe – legislative acts which are
all the more venerable and sacred, given that they rest on the proven results
of experience and facts; therefore every possible means must be tried to
destroy their force [i.e. of the Prior's claims].


    


decreto 1533.
      "Il privativo," soggiunge nel 1537, toglie la concorrenza, e
la gara, madre dell' industria; si tolga il pretesto delle cor-
rezioni, et aggiunta per carpir nuovi privileggi per il medesimo
libro"
, e nell' anno 1603, regolando i tempi, e la durata
de' privileggi per i soli libri di nuova impressione, hà raffer-
mata per tutti gli altri la massima della libertà in ogni tem-
po costantemente voluta.
      Sopra tali principi figli dell' esperienza, e della ragione s'
aggirarono in appresso le provvidenze tutte di questo Tribu-
nale fortunamente prescielto a proteggere il bene di quest'
Arte. Una serie di Terminazioni in tutto il corso del corren-
te secolo emanate hanno sempre proscritto l'abuso de' Pri-
vilegi; e se nell' anno 1762 fù vietato alle stamperie della
Terra Ferma di ristampare i libri de' Veneti editori, che
fossero stati per uscir di privilegio; questo fù un atto di
preferenza ai Veneti torchi, ai quali fù lasciata illesa la
primiera sua libertà, onde cadauno a proporzione de' suoi
fondi, e della sua industria dilatar potesse il proprio com-
mercio; e se alcuno in seguito ha creduto di poter sostene-
re coll' appoggio di peculiari combinazioni, e circostanze
una ulteriore estensione di privilegio, la giustizia di questo
Ecc.mo Magistrato ponderati in giudiziario confronto tutti i rappor-
ti della materia hà proscritto l'abuso, e sià consecrata con
solenne giudizio la libertà della stampa, come è avvenuto
nell'anno 1763.
      Ben conobbe chi con sommo valore ed artificio hà sostenu-
to gli assunti del Prior dell' Arte, e de' suoi consorti, l'impor-
tanza di così uniforme, e costante legislazione, cui si pregiano
d'imitare in presente le più colte nazioni d'Europa; tanto più
rispettabile, e sacra, quanto che appoggiata a provate rissult-
tanze d'esperienza, e di fatto; sià tentato perciò ogni mezo
possibile per distruggerne la forza.


    

Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) is co-published by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK and CREATe, School of Law, University of Glasgow, 10 The Square, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK