# Primary Sources on Copyright - Record Viewer
'Pezzana e Consorti' case: counter-petition and rulings, Venice (1781)

Source: N/A

Citation:
'Pezzana e Consorti' case: counter-petition and rulings, Venice (1781), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | No Commentaries
Translation only | Transcription only | Show all | Bundled images as pdf

            Chapter 1 Page 4 of 20 total



      These are laws, they argue, from earlier centuries, from other
times, they were designed to regulate an Art which was then only just emerging
;
but in this respect he [their lawyer] is all too confident of the antiquity of all
these laws, which, having always been passed with the same principle of opposition
to any excessive duration of privileges, have accompanied the progress of this
Art right up to the most recent times. For was this Art still 'just emerging' in 1705?
was it still in its cradle in 1745, in 1753, in 1764, and finally in 1767?!
      It is not true, he adds, that these laws were meant to uphold
the liberty of reprinting; in fact, they extended the duration of privileges.

But every word of all these laws demonstrates the contrary: they protect partial
and temporary privileges, but they certainly do not prescribe extensions and
abuses.
      Finally, he says, whatever these laws happened to be, the
Sovereign Prince was entitled to abolish them, and he has indeed abolished and
revoked them.
Alas, this is unfortunately all too true: but since the clemency
of the Prince has deigned, by granting an audience to our petition, to re-examine
such an argument, may the clemency of this Magistracy also deign to ascertain
whether a universal, absolute and unlimited exclusive right [privativo] to every
book is capable of producing the desired result and of increasing the prosperity
of this trade.
      Is there any axiom in the realm of commerce more universally accepted than
that which says that an exclusive right [privativo] destroys all speculation
and industry, and favours only idleness and monopoly?
      Whether or not this axiom is even appropriate for the nature of this Art and
this trade, is something that can be easily found out from the specific circumstances
of the latter.
      It is only too evident that large-scale activity in this trade [il grande di questo
commercio
] can only be rooted in, and nourished by, an abundance of products,
without which a vast and extensive circulation becomes impossible.
      It is from this abundance of products that the trade derives a fullness


    


      Sono leggi, diss' egli, d'altri secoli, e d'altri tempi, sono fatte
per diriggere un Arte ancora nascente
; ma in questa parte
è troppo convinto dall' epoca di tutte esse leggi, che passo passo
sempre collo stesso principio contrario alla soverchia estensione
de' privilegi hanno accompaganato i progessi di quest' Arte, sino
ai tempi più vicini. Era forse ancora nascente nel 1705?
era ancora nascente nel 1745, nel 53, nel 64, e finalmente nell'
anno 1767?
      Non è vero, soggiunse, che queste leggi sostenessero la liber-
tà della ristampa, anzi hanno esteso i privileggi.
Ma ogni
parola di tutte esse leggi dimostra il contrario, proteggono
il privileggio parziale, e temporaneo; ne prescrivono l'esten-
sione, e l'abuso.
      Finalmente, diss' egli, qualunque siano queste leggi, il
Sovrano poteva abolirle, e l'ha appunto abolite, e derogate.
Que-
sto è vero pur troppo: ma giacchè la clemenza del Prencipe si è
degnata coll'accordato ascolto di prendere in nuovo esame un
tale argomento, discenda la clemenza di questo Magistrato a conosce-
re ancora se l'universale, assoluto, interminabile privativo
per ogni libro, possa riportare il contemplato oggetto, e la mag-
gior felicità di questo commercio.
      Quale assioma in fatto di commercio più universalmente
ricevuto di quello, che il privativo destrugge la speculazione
e l'industria, e favorisse soltanto l'inerzia, e il monopolio?
      Se questo assioma convenga anche all' indole di quest'
Arte, e di questo traffico, ben si può conoscerlo dai suoi pecu-
liari rapporti.
      È troppo ragionevole, che il grande di questo commercio
non può essere piantato, e nutrito, se non che coll' abbondan-
za del genere, senza la quale impossibile si rende una vasta,
ed estesa circolazione.
      Dall' abbondanza del genere ne deriva la pienezza degli


    

Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) is co-published by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK and CREATe, School of Law, University of Glasgow, 10 The Square, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK