# Primary Sources on Copyright - Record Viewer
Letters from Sumner to Story, Washington D.C. (1834)

Source: Library of Congress, Joseph Story Papers

Citation:
Letters from Sumner to Story, Washington D.C. (1834), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | No Commentaries
Translation only | Transcription only | Show all | Bundled images as pdf

            Chapter 1 Page 3 of 8 total



No Translation available.


1790 in order to hold a copyright; he therefore
stated in full the opinion of the Court on that point.
      The above is a rUgged account of what passed
in a few minutes, but which reminded me of
Judge Cowen & his brethren on the N. York bench.
      Henry Wheaton, upon the altercation being over,
moved that the Court lodge their opinions with
the clerk, that he might procure a copy of
them. The Chief Justice said that the Court could
make no order on that point; but that
each judge could do with his opinion, as he
pleased. I have forgotten to state that
Baldwin said that he should write out his
opinion & hand it to the Clerk or take some
other way of giving it publicity
.
      The case of the U. States [XXX] District Courts,
U.S. for Southern District of N. York is now
arguing by the Attorney General.

      Yesterday afternoon. The Court had adjourned at 2 1/2 o'clock.
I feel now sad - that [???] occupation in Washington
is fine. I feel also solitary from your absence - though
had you been here, I then would, of course, have enjoyed your so-
ciety. Yet there would have been the pleasant & strengthening
sense that you were within call.
      I met Judge [???] this afternoon who introduced me
once the unpleasant occurance of the [???] -
said that he never before witnessed such a scene on

    

Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) is co-published by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK and CREATe, School of Law, University of Glasgow, 10 The Square, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK