Fine Art Copyright Bill (27 Feb.), London (1862)

Source: ProQuest: Parliamentary Papers (1862) Paper No.26, I.485-492

Citation:
Fine Art Copyright Bill (27 Feb.), London (1862), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org

Back | Record | Images | No Commentaries
Record-ID: uk_1862i

Permanent link: https://www.copyrighthistory.org/cam/tools/request/showRecord.php?id=record_uk_1862i

Full title:
Bill for amending Law relating to Copyright in Works of Fine Art, 1862, Paper No.26, I.485-492 (27 Feb.)

Full title original language:
N/A

Abstract:
This document is associated with the following core document: uk_1862

Commentary: No commentaries for this record.

Bibliography:
N/A

Related documents in this database:
1853: Blaine's Laws of Artistic Copyright
1858: Report of the Artistic Copyright Committee
1861: Fine Art Copyright Bill
1861: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Bill (6 May)
1862: Fine Art Copyright Act
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (28 Feb.)
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (6 March)
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (20 March)
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (31 March)
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (22 May)
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (23 May)
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (5 June)
1862: Parliamentary Debates on the Fine Art Copyright Act (24 July)
1862: Fine Art Copyright Bill (20 March)

Author: N/A

Publisher: N/A

Year: 1862

Location: London

Language: English

Source: ProQuest: Parliamentary Papers (1862) Paper No.26, I.485-492

Persons referred to:
Atherton, Sir William
Massey, William Nathaniel
Palmer, Roundell, 1st Earl of Selborne
Victoria

Places referred to:
England
Ireland
Scotland

Cases referred to:
N/A

Institutions referred to:
Court of Sessions, Scotland
House of Commons
Parliament

Legislation:
N/A

Keywords:
contract
drawings, protected subject matter
duration, post mortem term
formalities
fraud
importation
paintings, protected subject matter
penalties, paid to author(s)
photography, protected subject matter

Responsible editor: Ronan Deazley


Our Partners


Copyright statement

You may copy and distribute the translations and commentaries in this resource, or parts of such translations and commentaries, in any medium, for non-commercial purposes as long as the authorship of the commentaries and translations is acknowledged, and you indicate the source as Bently & Kretschmer (eds), Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) (www.copyrighthistory.org).

You may not publish these documents for any commercial purposes, including charging a fee for providing access to these documents via a network. This licence does not affect your statutory rights of fair dealing.

Although the original documents in this database are in the public domain, we are unable to grant you the right to reproduce or duplicate some of these documents in so far as the images or scans are protected by copyright or we have only been able to reproduce them here by giving contractual undertakings. For the status of any particular images, please consult the information relating to copyright in the bibliographic records.


Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900) is co-published by Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, 10 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DZ, UK and CREATe, School of Law, University of Glasgow, 10 The Square, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK